USPTO serial 76020956
PLYMOUTH STEEL CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLYMOUTH STEEL CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL H. BLISS
DANIEL H BLISS BLISS MCGLYNN, PC2075 W BIG BEAVER, STE 600TROY, MI 48084-3443UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | carbon and alloy drawn steel bars | ACTIVE | May 15, 1972 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |