USPTO serial 76021507
FRIOBOX EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRIOBOX EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith M. Stolte
KEITH M STOLTE MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY227 W MONROECHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | thermoinsulated containers vessels and packaging for shipping and transporting foods, beverages, plants, human and animal issues, pharmaceuticals, medicines, medical products, dry goods, liquids, chilled and frozen goods through courier and general mail systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |