USPTO serial 76021548
GLAMORAMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLAMORAMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Long Island City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward C. Meagher
Edward C. Meagher Carter, DeLuca, Farrell and Schmidt, LLP445 Broad Hollow RoadSuite 420Melville, NY 11747Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, EYELINER AND MASCARA FEATURING SYNTHETIC FIBERS FOR LENGTHENING EYELASHES | ACTIVE | Aug 27, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |