USPTO serial 76021655
NEXUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, GREG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEXUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter F. Weinberg
PETER F WEINBERG GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP1801 CALIFORNIA ST STE 4100DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRIC ACCUMULATORS FOR BICYCLES, ANTI-THEFT-WARNING DEVICE FOR BICYCLES, ELECTRIC CABLES, COMPUTERS FOR BICYCLES, DERAILLEURS CONTROLLED BY COMPUTER, SPEED INDICATORS, AUTOMATIC INDICATORS FOR PRESSURE IN BICYCLE TIRES; HELMETS FOR BICYCLES; EYEGLASSES, SUNGLASSES, AND CASES THEREOF | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | PARTS FOR BICYCLES, NAMELY, HUBS, INTERNAL GEAR HUBS, HUB QUICK RELEASE LEVERS, GEAR RELEASE LEVERS, GEAR SHIFT LEVERS, FRONT DERAILLEURS, REAR DERAILLEURS, CHAIN GUIDES, FREEWHEELS, SPROCKETS, PULLEYS, CHAINS, CHAIN DEFLECTORS, SHIFT CABLES, CRANKS, CRANK SETS, CHAIN WHEELS, PEDALS, TOE CLIPS, BRAKE LEVERS, FRONT BRAKES, REAR BRAKES, BRAKE SHOES, RIMS, WHEELS, SPOKES, SPOKE CLIPS, BOTTOM BRACKETS, SEAT PILLARS, SEAT PILLAR QUICK RELEASE, HEAD PARTS FOR FRAME-FORK ASSEMBLY, FRAMES, SUSPENSIONS, HANDLEBARS, HANDLE STEMS, GRIPS, FOR HANDLEBARS, SADDLES, MUDGUARDS, KICK STANDS, CARRIERS, BELLS, HORNS AND REARVIEW MIRROR FOR BICYCLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |