USPTO serial 76021947
SILVERADO BREWING CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SILVERADO BREWING CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Alexander Floum
D ALEXANDER FLOUM THE SCHINNER LAW GROUP40 FIRST ST 4TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2003 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |