USPTO serial 76022036
VIADYNE IT MANAGEMENT SERVICE CENTRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIADYNE IT MANAGEMENT SERVICE CENTRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ontario, L1W 3R2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Fishman
MICHAEL D FISHMAN RADER FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVEBLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE, NAMELY, HELP DESK FUNCTIONS PROVIDING A SET OF FORMS AND FUNCTIONS TO TRACK AND MANAGE USER SERVICE DISRUPTIONS, REQUESTS FOR SERVICE AND SERVICE RESTORATIONS DUE TO INFRASTRUCTURE OUTAGES, CHANGE MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS PROVIDING A SET OF FORMS AND FUNCTIONS USED TO TRACK, APPROVE, MONITOR AND MANAGE CHANGES IMPLEMENTED WITHIN THE INFRASTRUCTURE; PROBLEM MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS PROVIDING A SET OF FORMS AND FUNCTIONS TO INITIATE AND TRACK INVESTIGATIONS INTO COMPUTER PROBLEMS IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY ROOT CAUSES OF THE PROBLEMS, TO TRACK AND TO BRING RESOLUTION TO KNOWN COMPUTER ERRORS, AND TO PROVIDE A KNOWLEDGE BASE, RESTORATIONS AND/OR REQUESTS FOR COMPUTER SERVICE, TEMPLATES AND SCRIPTS TO ASSIST IN COMPUTER SERVICE RESTORATIONS AND/OR REQUESTS FOR COMPUTER SERVICE, ASSET/CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS PROVIDING A SET OF FORMS AND FUNCTIONS USED TO MONITOR AND TRACK INVENTORY OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS AND PROCEDURES, TO DEFINE ATTRIBUTES OF AND RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SUCH HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS AND PROCEDURES WITHIN THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE, AND TO DETAIL THE CONTRACTUAL AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE; SERVICE LEVEL MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS PROVIDING A SET OF FORMS AND FUNCTIONS USED TO DOCUMENT SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS, NAMELY, WRITTEN AGREEMENTS BETWEEN SERVICE PROVIDERS AND CUSTOMERS WHICH DOCUMENT AGREED SERVICE LEVELS FOR A SERVICE, AND TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTIONS TO BE EXECUTED TO MAINTAIN, JUSTIFY, MEASURE AND MONITOR THOSE SERVICE LEVELS WITH RESPECT TO SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS AND OPERATIONAL LEVEL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICE PROVIDERS AND USERS, AND BETWEEN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT GROUPS, AND; CONTACT MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS PROVIDING A SET OF FORMS AND FUNCTIONS USED TO DEFINE AND TRACK ORGANIZATION AND SUPPORT STRUCTURES, NAMELY, LOGICAL GROUPINGS OF PEOPLE BROKEN DOWN INTO DISCRETE OPERATIONAL GROUPS AND EMPLOYMENT POSITIONS TO ENABLE IDENTIFICATION OF BUSINESS OPERATIONAL AREAS, GEOGRAPHICAL SITES AND LOCATIONS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE AND PEOPLE, THEIR ATTRIBUTES, ASSOCIATIONS AND ROLES WITHIN THE ORGANIZATION AND WITHIN THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |