USPTO serial 76022469
AMIGOPHONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMIGOPHONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN P. JOHNSON
STEPHEN P JOHNSON AKERMAN SENTERFITT & EDISON PA1 SE 3RD AVE 28TH FLMIAMI, FL 33131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, the electronic transmission of data, facsimile, voice, video and information; Telnet services, namely, the remote access and transmission of data and information between computers; Electronic commerce services, namely, electronic transmission and reception of data, documents and information; Electronic data interchange network services; and Voice mail and voice messaging services, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone, all over the global computer network; Providing multiple-user access to a global information network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Managed service provider services, namely, the deign, implementation, management and monitoring of mission critical server-based applications and information technology infrastructure; Application service provider featuring software in the field of electronic commerce transactions for billing and invoicing, communications for voice messaging and electronic mail messaging, and document and database preparation for spreadsheets and word processing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |