USPTO serial 76022488
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine L. Lofgren, Esq.
CHRISTINE L LOFGREN ESQ JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO LLP2121 AVE OF THE STARS, 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | DEVELOPING HOLIDAY AND SPECIAL OCCASION SALES PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGNS FOR OTHERS; CONDUCTING MARKETING STUDIES AND PREPARING RESEARCH REPORTS; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH A SHOPPING REWARDS PROGRAM; PROVIDING INFORMATIONAL AND PROMOTIONAL SERVICES; DEVELOPMENT OF PROMOTIONAL SERVICE CAMPAIGNS; DEVELOPMENT OF TENANT MOTIVATION AND SALES PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGNS; AWARD SERVICES, NAMELY SOLICITING NOMINATIONS AND PRESENTING AWARDS TO PERSONS FOR DEMONSTRATING EXCELLENCE IN THE AREA OF MALL SERVICES, CUSTOMER SERVICE AND/OR COMMUNITY SERVICE; LEASING, OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SHOPPING CENTERS AND MALLS; COMMUNITY SERVICE ORIENTED PROJECTS; CHARITABLE FUND RAISING SERVICES; RENOVATION, DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT OF SHOPPING CENTERS AND MALLS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |