USPTO serial 76022652
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Fisher Controls International, LLC
St. Louis, MO
Other trademarks owned by Fisher Controls International, LLC
Fisher Controls International, Inc.
Clayton, MO
Other trademarks owned by Fisher Controls International, Inc.
Fisher Controls International, Inc.
Clayton, MO
Other trademarks owned by Fisher Controls International, Inc.
Fisher Controls International, Inc.
Clayton, MO
Other trademarks owned by Fisher Controls International, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. LaBarge
Richard M. LaBarge Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLPSuite 6300 Sears Tower233 S Wacker DriveCHICAGO, IL 60606| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | industrial controls valves for throttling the flow of fluids | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |