USPTO serial 76022950
PINN BANK 24-HOUR ONLINE BANKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PINN BANK 24-HOUR ONLINE BANKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria H. Finley
VICTORIA H FINLEY1500 WOODMEN TWROMAHA, NE 68102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, INTERACTIVE AND ONLINE BANKING SERVICES AND RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE AND LENDING SERVICES OFFERED TO CORPORATE AND INDIVIDUAL CONSUMERS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |