USPTO serial 76023086
UNIQTRONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNIQTRONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
Burton S. Ehrlich LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S. Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | illumination systems comprised of one or more gas discharge bulbs, an electronic lighting ballast, and parts, fittings and accessories for the aforesaid lighting, illumination and ballast systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 13, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |