USPTO serial 76023327
PEDI-CURE-IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEDI-CURE-IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | foot care products, namely, revitalizing and cleaning preparations for foot baths, foot gels, foot soaks, foot scrub, cuticle-remover creams, moisturizing lotions, cooling lotions, foot creams, foot masks, cleansing grains, non-medicated foot powder, scented foot sprays, aromatherapy oils, non-medicated bath salts; fingernail products, namely, polish base coat, top coat, nail colors, nail polish remover, cream strengtheners, nail hardener, nail conditioners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |