Drawing for LOOK AT US WOW!

USPTO serial 76023393

LOOK AT US WOW!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOOK AT US WOW!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wendy K. Marsh

Wendy K. Marsh Nyemaster, Goode, West, Hansell & O'Brien700 Walnut StreetSuite 1600Des Moines, IA 50309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035mail order catalog services featuring transportation accessories, namely, chrome truck accessories, stainless steel truck accessories, exhaust, lights and lens, tool boxes, air deflectors, wooden consoles, wheel simulators, neon, mirrors, drivers' accessories, floor mats air filters, nut covers, bezels, cabguards, bumpers, center panels, light brackets, and bumper guidesACTIVE—
042truck stops; and truck weighing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 7, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 20, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 5, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 5, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 15, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 28, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 20, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 25, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 19, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 19, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance