Drawing for XS GIRLS

USPTO serial 76023750

XS GIRLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XS GIRLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRIS CARMICHAEL

CHRIS CARMICHAEL INTERNATIONAL APPAREL GROUP LLC11 COLUMBIA, STE BALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely t-shirts, shirts, shorts, pants, sweaters, hats, jackets, socks, and underwearACTIVE—
035promoting the goods and services of others by placing advertisements and promotional displays in an electronic site accessed through computer networksACTIVE—
042providing information of general interest to young adults and teenagers by means of a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 27, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 31, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 10, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance