CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DISCOVERY

USPTO serial 76023876

DISCOVERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISCOVERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin G. Smith

KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SEAS PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029MEAT, POULTRY; GAME, FISH, SEAFOOD; FOODSTUFFS MADE FROM MEAT, NAMELY, CHILI CON CARNE; POTATO-BASED SNACK FOODS; VEGETABLE-BASED FILLINGS; PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; VEGETABLE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, RE-FRIED BEANS; SOUPS; DIPS, EXCLUDING SALSA AND OTHER SAUCES USED AS DIPS; PICKLES, RELISHES, PROCESSED AVOCADO PULP AND GUACAMOLE; PROCESSED PEPPERS; JALAPENOS PEPPERS, PROCESSED TOMATILLOS AND JALAPENOSACTIVE—
030RICE-BASED SNACK FOODS; CONSTITUENTS FOR MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PREPARED PASTA OR RICE; SAUCES, RELISHES; SPICES AND SEASONINGS, SALSAS, MARINADES, MAYONNAISE, SALAD DRESSINGS, NON-ESSENTIAL OIL FOR FOOD FLAVORINGS; DRIED CHILI PEPPERS FOR USE IN SEASONING, PROCESSED CEREALS AND PREPARATIONS MADE FROM CEREALS, BREAD AND BREAD PRODUCTS FOR FOOD; TORTILLAS AND TORTILLA CHIPSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 25, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 26, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 31, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 17, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 17, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 17, 2004OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Dec 12, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 12, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 15, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 20, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance