Drawing for INSTITUTE FOR INNOVATION IN HOME HEALTHCARE

USPTO serial 76023910

INSTITUTE FOR INNOVATION IN HOME HEALTHCARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSTITUTE FOR INNOVATION IN HOME HEALTHCARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heather L. Danzig

HEATHER L DANZIG STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP180 MAIDEN LNNEW YORK, NY 10038UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035computerized on-line ordering, telephone ordering and catalog services, featuring publications in the field of interactive home health careACTIVE—
042providing information in the field of interactive home health careACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance