USPTO serial 76024021
SAHU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2931050Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 8, 2005
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAHU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Antonio, TX
San Antonio, TX
Providence, RI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine M. Clayton
Catherine M. Clayton Gibbons P.C.One Pennsylvania Plaza, 37th FloorNew York, NY 10119-3701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, jackets, blazers, coats, parkas, rainwear, headwear, hats, scarves, shirts, blouses, sweaters, dresses, skirts, jumpers, pants, jeans, shorts, jogging suits, robes, sleepwear, underclothes, body suits, swimwear and beachwear | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 21, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |