USPTO serial 76024140
BOOMERANG MARKETING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOOMERANG MARKETING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN W. PROVO
JOHN W PROVO MASLON EDELMAN BORMANSEVENTH90 S 7TH ST STE 3300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4140Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | INCENTIVE AWARD PROGRAMS TO PROMOTE THE SALE OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS WHICH PROVIDE CONSUMERS WITH VIRTUAL CURRENCY REDEEMABLE BY VARIOUS MERCHANTS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THOUGH A CONSUMER LOYALTY PROGRAM OFFERING REWARDS, NAMELY, PROVIDING CONSUMERS WITH VIRTUAL CURRENCY EARNED THROUGH THE PURCHASE OF GOODS AND SERVICES WHICH ARE REDEEMABLE BY MERCHANT VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | CONSUMER LOYALTY PROGRAM THAT PROVIDES CONSUMERS WITH VIRTUAL CURRENCY REDEEMABLE BY VARIOUS MERCHANTS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |