USPTO serial 76024201
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Grand Rapids, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Mitchell
James A. Mitchell Varnum Riddering Schmidt & Howlett LLP333 Bridge Street, P.O. Box 352Grand Rapids, MI 49501UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF ON-GOING RELIGIOUS RADIO PROGRAMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 10, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |