USPTO serial 76024458
THE BINGO PLAYERS CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE BINGO PLAYERS CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel
LARA PEARSON LAW OFFICE OF LARA PEARSON, LTD774 MAYS BLVD N 10 PMB 405INCLINE, NV 89451UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | turnkey electronic bingo systems, namely (1) Electronic Video Player Terminals on fixed bases and portable units; (2) software for playing a progressive bingo game and a cumulative prize bingo game | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |