USPTO serial 76024571
QUICKRAMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUICKRAMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Arouh
JEFFREY A AROUH GILBERT, SEGALL AND YOUNG LLP430 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE MORTGAGE AND COMMERCIAL LOAN FIELD FOR PROCESSING COMMERCIAL LOANS, CONDUCTING DUE DILIGENCE AND ORIGINATING AND CLOSING LOANS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION OF COMMERCIAL LOAN PROCESSING, DUE DILIGENCE, CLOSING, ORIGINATION AND PROGRAM MARKETING RESEARCH AND STUDIES FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | COMMERCIAL LOAN SERVICES, NAMELY COMMERCIAL LOAN PROCESSING, DUE DILIGENCE, CLOSING AND ORIGINATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |