Drawing for BLUE ZONE

USPTO serial 76024621

BLUE ZONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUE ZONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine S. Chang

ANANYA DASH PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP75 E 55TH STNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing interactive development and management services to the broadcasting industry and receivers of interactive broadcasting content, namely, business management planning and business consulting in strategic planning and management services to the broadcasting industry dealing with the broadcasting of interactive contentACTIVE
042Providing interactive software development services to the broadcasting industry and receivers of ineractive broadcasting content, namely designing and customizing user interfaces for the broadcasting and receiving of interactive contentACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 11, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 25, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Apr 14, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Apr 14, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Aug 4, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 15, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 14, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance