Drawing for THE MILLIONAIRE NEXT DOOR

USPTO serial 76024804

THE MILLIONAIRE NEXT DOOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE MILLIONAIRE NEXT DOOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL D HOBBS JR

MICHAEL D HOBBS JR TROUTMAN SANDERS LLPBANK OF AMERICA PLZ STE 5200600 PEACHTREE ST NEATLANTA, GA 30308-2216

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Sound recorded tapes and compact discs and video recorded tapes concerning self-improvement and wealth accumulation; CD-ROMs and computer software in the field of self-improvement and wealth accumulationACTIVEOct 14, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 2, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 31, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 30, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 3, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 16, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 3, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 8, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 20, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance