USPTO serial 76024890
MYTVTAXI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MYTVTAXI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Hartje Cardwell
DANA HARTJE CARDWELL SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS AND PROMOTIONAL DISPLAYS IN AN ELECTRONIC SITE CONTAINING INFORMATION PERTAINING TO ENTERTAINMENT AND TELEVISION PROGRAMMING AND ACCESSED THROUGH COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2000 |
| 041 | PROVIDING INFORMATION VIA THE INTERNET REGARDING TELEVISION PROGRAMS, SCHEDULING, RATING AND REVIEWS | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |