Drawing for JACQUES WHITFORD

USPTO serial 76025064

JACQUES WHITFORD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2703498Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 8, 2003
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with JACQUES WHITFORD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander Rozenblat

Alexander Rozenblat Jenner & Block LLP353 N. Clark StreetChicago, IL 60654-3456UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Risk management; consultation in the field of risk managementSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 1, 1992
037Excavation services; site sampling services, namely collecting samples of soil and other physical specimens of land parcels; site assessment, namely, evaluation of the physical condition of land; land redevelopment services, namely, planning and laying out new uses for land; environmental remediation services, namely, asbestos and hazardous material disposalSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 1, 1992
040Environmental remediation services, namely soil, waste, water, asbestos and hazardous material treatment services; waste management; planning in the field of waste managementSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 1, 1992
042Engineering; engineering in the fields of agronomy, agriculture, hydrogeology, and geotechnical materials; engineering analysis of soil, water, waste, and structural and systems integrity; engineering design for others; field and laboratory testing of air quality, soils, water, waste, seismic activity, energy use, and hazardous materials; consultation services in the field of engineering, land use, regulatory permitting, environmental impact of land use, cultural impact of land use, traditional land use by aboriginals, protection of aboriginal sites, mitigation of impact of land use on existing resources, and workplace health, safety and environment; planning in the field of revegetation of land; seismic and liquefaction evaluations of land for others; air quality and noise management; facility decommissioning, namely, engineering services relating to the closure of facilities and termination of operations; site assessment, namely, land surveying; research in the field of biophysical and social sciences; energy and waste auditsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 1, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2013CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Nov 17, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 8, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 5, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Mar 3, 2009E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 14, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 5, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance