USPTO serial 76025089
INSTANT PRESENTATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSTANT PRESENTATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori N. Boatright
LORI N BOATRIGHT BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | SERVICES FOR PRODUCING AND DISTRIBUTING PRESENTATIONS OVER THE WEB, NAMELY TO ALLOW USERS TO UPLOAD CONTENT VIA THE TELEPHONE, RECORD A NARRATION OVER THE TELEPHONE, AND CONVERT THE CONTENT TO AN INTEGRATED AUDIO, VIDEO, AND GRAPHIC-BASED CONTENT PROGRAM WHICH CAN BE DELIVERED AND VIEWED BY UNLIMITED VIEWERS BY MEANS OF COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS OR REMOVABLE MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Presenter.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Presenter.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by WEBEX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named INSTANT PRESENTATION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |