Drawing for CM CHRISTIAN MARTIN

USPTO serial 76025097

CM CHRISTIAN MARTIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TOLPIN, BRETT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CM CHRISTIAN MARTIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paulette R. Carey

PAULETTE R CAREY BUCHMAN & O'BRIEN, LLP510 THORNALL ST STE 200EDISON, NJ 08837UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair care products namely, permanent wave preparations and hair straightening preparations; hair dyes, hair shampoos and hair conditioners; hair finishing rinses; hydrogen peroxides for use on the hair; conditioner liquids for dry and brittle hair, for fine and limp hair, for oily and heavy hair and for dyed and permed hair; conditioners for long and brittle hair; conditioners for permed hair; hair relaxers; vitamin treatment creams for dry, brittle and permed hair; deep-treatment creams for dyed hair; hair bleaching preparations in oil form; hair bleaching preparations i powder form; hair streaking powder; hair gel; hair glaze; hair restructuring cream; hair styling foam; hair styling gel; cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes and end papers for perm applications; aerosol hair spray and non-aerosol hair sprayACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 19, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 25, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance