USPTO serial 76025126
THE POWER OF E-BUSINESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE POWER OF E-BUSINESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIA SPOOR GARD
JULIA SPOOR GARD BARNES & THORNBURG1313 MERCHANTS BANK BLDG11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS AND TECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF E-COMMERCE, NAMELY, PLANNING AND DESIGNING OF E-COMMERCE COMPUTER SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, NETWORK PLANNING, CORPORATE INTRANET PLANNING, CORPORATE E-COMMERCE MARKETPLACES, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PERMITTING THIRD-PARTY BUSINESSES TO SELL GOODS AND SERVICES THROUGH A GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK SYSTEM | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF E-COMMERCE COMPUTER SYSTEMS, NAMELY, DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT OF E-COMMERCE COMPUTER SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PERMITTING THIRD-PARTY BUSINESSES TO SELL GOODS AND SERVICES THROUGH A GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK SYSTEM | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |