Drawing for TATUM CIO SOLUTION

USPTO serial 76025294

TATUM CIO SOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TATUM CIO SOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SIDNEY R BROWN

SIDNEY R BROWN JONES DAY REAVIS & POGUE3500 SUNTRUST PLZ303 PEACHTREE ST NEATLANTA, GA 30308

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation, namely, providing business advice regarding information officer services and developing business models for information officer services; business development services, namely, developing business models and spreadsheets for others in the field of information office servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 30, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance