USPTO serial 76025351
ULTRACAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTRACAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Clitheroe, Lancashire BB7 1PE, GB
Clitheroe, Lancashire BB7 1PE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARRIET E. PERKINS
HARRIET E PERKINS DRINKER BIDDLE AND REATH LLP18TH AND CHERRY STS1 LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6996Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN SYSTEMS COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, AND COMPUTERS; ALL OF THE FOREGOING GOODS USED FOR DESIGN OF CONSERVATORY ROOF AND GLAZED ROOF STRUCTURES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | MANUALS, HANDBOOKS AND PRINTED EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS, ALL IN THE FIELD OF CONSERVATORY AND GLAZED ROOF STRUCTURE DESIGN | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ultraframe (UK) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Ultraframe (UK) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named ULTRACAD
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |