USPTO serial 76025457
ARVINMERITOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARVINMERITOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marjory G. Basile
MARJORY G BASILE MILLER CANFIELD PADDOCK & STONE PLC150 W JEFFERSON AVE STE 2500DETROIT, MI 48226UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Manufacture of general product lines in the field of automobiles to the order and specification of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |