USPTO serial 76025556
RANDOLPH DUKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RANDOLPH DUKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay H. Begler
JAY H BEGLER BUCHANAN INGERSOLL PC140 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes, astringents for cosmetic purposes, shaving balm, non-medicated lip balm, bath oil, bath powder, non-medicated bath salts, blusher, body cream, body oil, body powder, cold cream, cologne, compacts, hair conditioners, cosmetic pencils, eye cream, hand cream, night cream, shaving cream, skin-cleansing cream, skin cream, vanishing cream, deodorant soap, personal deodorants, perfume, antiperspirants, essential oils for personal use, eye makeup, eye makeup remover, eye shadow, face powder, facial scrubs, foundation makeup, bath gel, hair gel, shaving gel, shower gel, tooth gel, lip gloss, lipstick, hair spray, mascara, massage oil, skin moisturizer, nail polish, rouge, sachets, hair shampoo, toilet water, sun screen preparations, sun block preparations, wrinkle removing skin care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Backpacks, athletic bags, beach bags, duffel bags, travelling bags, school bags, carry-on bags, billfolds, business card cases, felt pouches, handbags, waist packs, pocketbooks, drawstring pouches, change purses, key cases, parasols, pocket wallets, pouches, purses, name card cases, mesh and fabric shopping bags, suitcases, umbrella covers, umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Ski boots, anklets, athletic footwear, athletic shoes, athletic uniforms, head bands, neck bands, sweat bands, wrist bands, bathing caps, bathing suits, bathing trunks, bathrobes, beachwear, beach coverups, money belts, belts made of cloth, berets, bermuda shorts, cloth bibs, ski bibs, bikinis, blazers, body suits, booties, boots, hiking boots, boxer shorts, bathing caps, shower caps, hats of all kinds, coats of all kinds, ear muffs, footwear, gloves, ski-gloves, golf shirts, gowns, gym suits, headbands, hosiery; infantwear, insoles, jeans, dungarees, jogging suits, jumpers, jumpsuits, knee highs, leg warmers, leggings, leotards, mittens, ear muffs and hand muffs, neckties, overalls, pajamas, panties, pantsuits, rainwear, robes, rubbers, sandals, scarves, shirts of all kinds, including poloshirts, sport shirts, nightshirts, undershirts, boxer shorts, sweatshorts, skiwear, sleepwear, sneakers, snow pants, socks, suits, flight suits, play suits, ski suits, snow suits, sweat suits, warm up suits, wet suits, sun visors, suspenders, tennis wear, tennis shoes, dress shoes, walking shoes, tights, halter tops and tank tops, track suits, underwear, uniforms, vests, foul weather gear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Duke, Randolph
- Other trademarks owned by Duke, Randolph
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named RANDOLPH DUKE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |