USPTO serial 76025581
E-SELECT PAYMENT SERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-SELECT PAYMENT SERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Rosini
PETER F WEINBERG GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP1801 CALIFORNIA ST STE 4100DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE THAT ALLOWS SALES TRANSACTIONS, PRE-AUTHORIZATIONS, REFUNDS, AND REGULAR MONTHLY OR RECURRING PAYMENTS TO BE PROCESSED AT THE POINT OF SALE FOR MERCHANTS, AND THE ELECTRONIC TRANSFER OF FUNDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | PROVIDING FOR ON-LINE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE IN THE NATURE OF THE ELECTRONIC TRANSFER OF FUNDS AND PROCESSING OF FUNDS FROM SALES TRANSACTIONS, CREDIT CARD PRE-AUTHORIZATIONS, REFUNDS, AND REGULAR MONTHLY OR RECURRING PAYMENTS AT THE POINT OF SALE FOR MERCHANTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |