Drawing for DIGITAL FINGERPRINT SENSOR

USPTO serial 76025706

DIGITAL FINGERPRINT SENSOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL FINGERPRINT SENSOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan L. Cassel

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009FINGERPRINT SENSOR DEVICE FOR ELECTRONIC IDENTIFICATION AND VERIFICATION OF USERS OF CERTAIN EQUIPMENT AND APPARATUS; THE FOLLOWING GOODS INCORPORATING A FINGERPRINT SENSOR DEVICE FOR ELECTRONIC IDENTIFICATION AND VERIFICATION OF THE USERS THEREOF; MAGNETICALLY ENCODED INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CARDS FOR USE IN BANKING, CREDIT, E-COMMERCE AND OTHER LIKE TRANSACTIONS AND FOR SUCH OTHER USES AS MAY BE APPROPRIATE; CELLULAR PHONES; COMPUTER SYSTEMS, NAMELY, PERSONAL COMPUTERS, MAINFRAMES, SERVERS, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, DATA COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, SPECIFICALLY, ROUTERS AND MODEMS, AND ENCRYPTION DEVICES, NAMELY, ETHERNET SECURITY MODULES, DIGITAL SIGNAL SCRAMBLING TRANSMITTERS AND SOFTWARE ENCRYPTION PROGRAMSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2004COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 6, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 15, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 6, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 200144EASEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED—
Nov 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance