Drawing for THE .WEB INTERNET DOMAIN REGISTRY

USPTO serial 76026047

THE .WEB INTERNET DOMAIN REGISTRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE .WEB INTERNET DOMAIN REGISTRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary J. Nelson

David J. Steele CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPPO BOX 29001GLENDALE, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035COMMERCIAL INFORMATION AND DIRECTORY SERVICES FEATURING DIRECTORIES FOR LOCATING THE COMPUTER NETWORK ADDRESSES AND DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION OF ENTITIES; COMPUTER NETWORK ADDRESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, ENABLING ENTITIES TO ACCESS, ADD, MODIFY OR DELETE INFORMATION RELATING TO THEIR COMPUTER NETWORK ADDRESSES; PROVIDING A DIRECTORY OF ORGANIZATIONS, INDIVIDUALS, ADDRESSES, AND RESOURCES INDIVIDUALS, ADDRESSES, AND RESOURCES ACCESSIBLE THROUGH THE USE OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVEJul 31, 1996
038ELECTRONIC MAIL AND ELECTRONIC STORE AND FORWARD MESSAGING OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; REDIRECTION OF WEB SITE ACCESS OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVEJul 31, 1996
042DOMAIN NAME REGISTRY SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FOR OTHERS ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING SEARCH ENGINES FOR OBTAINING DATA ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; REGISTERING, SECURING, RESERVING AND TRACKING NETWORK ADDRESSES ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKSACTIVEJul 31, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 11, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 26, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 12, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 9, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 16, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 15, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 19, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 8, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 21, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 21, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 18, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 2, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 7, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 17, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 24, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 14, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 7, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 3, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 2, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 21, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2000PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2000PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance