USPTO serial 76026048
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tony Vecino
TONY VECINO COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS, LLP222 KEARNY ST 7TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Malt beverages, namely, beer, ale and stout | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 2, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |