USPTO serial 76026067
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda Heban
DANIEL L BOOTS BINGHAM MCHALE LLP2700 MARKET TWR 10 W MARKET STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network, namely, for facilitating online shopping and purchasing by means of electronic communications networks; communication software used to access and search for product and services information from websites on global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | electronic commerce services, namely, dissemination of advertising for others via an online electronic communications network, online retail store services and ordering services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; promoting the products and services of electronic and brick-and-mortar merchants by conducting contests and through the administration of incentive awards programs; promoting the goods and services of others by providing consumer benefits through a frequent shopper's program | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | electronic commerce services, namely electronic credit card and debit transactions, funds transfers and bill payment processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic commerce services, namely, electronic transmission and reception of data, documents and information via computer; electronic data interchange network services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |