USPTO serial 76026077
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
CHUO-KU, TOKYO, JP
CHUO-KU, TOKYO, JP
Yamanouchi Pharma Technologies, Inc.
Palo Alto, CA
Other trademarks owned by Yamanouchi Pharma Technologies, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara L. Friedman
Barbara L. Friedman Hanson Bridgett LLP425 Market Street, 26th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94105-5401UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | (Based on Use in Commerce) SWALLOW-FACILITATING FORMULATION SOLD AS AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT OF PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISEASE OR HEALTH-RELATED CONDITIONS INVOLVING BLOOD AND BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS, THE CARDIAC CIRCULATORY SYSTEMS, THE PERIPHERAL VASCULAR CIRCULATORY SYSTEM, THE ENDOCRINE SYSTEM, THE GENITOURINARY SYSTEM, THE IMMUNE SYSTEM, INFECTIOUS AND PARASITIC CONDITIONS, THE UPPER AND LOWER DIGESTIVE SYSTEM, MENTAL DISORDERS, METABOLIC DISORDERS, MULTI-SYSTEM AND ILL-DEFINED CONDITIONS, MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEMS AND CONNECTIVE TISSUE, NEOPLASMS, THE NERVOUS SYSTEM, NUTRITIONAL DISORDERS, PREGNANCY, THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM, SENSORY ORGAN CONDITIONS, SKIN AND SUBCUTANEOUS CONDITIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 1997 |
| 040 | (Based on Section 44(e) only) MANUFACTURE OF RAPIDLY DISSOLVING PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS TO THE ORDER OR SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | (Based on Section 44(e) only) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF RAPIDLY DISSOLVING PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR OTHERS, AND PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT CONSULTATION REGARDING THE TESTING, EVALUATING, OR RESEARCHING OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |