Drawing for VOYAGE

USPTO serial 76026160

VOYAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOYAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAULA J. KRASNY

PAULA J KRASNY BAKER & MCKENZIE130 E RANDOLPH DR STE 3500ONE PRUDENTIAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003(Based on Intent to Use) PERFUMES AND PERFUMERY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, TOILET WATER, COLOGNES, AFTER SHAVE LOTIONS, ROOM FRAGRANCES AND POTPOURRI; ETHEREAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; BABY OILS, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; AROMATHERAPY OILS; NON-MEDICATED TOILET PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, SKIN SOAPS, SKIN CLEANSERS AND HAIR LOTIONS; COSMETICS, NAMELY, EYEBROW PENCILS, EYE LINER, EYE SHADOW, MASCARA, BLUSHER, LIPSTICKS, FACIAL AND FOUNDATION MAKE-UP, FACE POWDER, NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, NAIL ENAMELACTIVE—
018(Based on Intent to Use) ARTICLES OF LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER, NAMELY, BRIEFCASES, HOLDALLS, WALLETS, BANK CARD CASES, CREDIT CARD CASES, BUSINESS CARD CASES, NOTEBOOK CASES, NOTE CASESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 25, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 2, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 22, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance