USPTO serial 76026208
ROGERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROGERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M4W 1G9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Silverman
DAVID M SILVERMAN COLE RAYWID & BRAVERMAN LLP1919 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N W STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Point of deployment devices (PODS), namely an electronic authorization circuit packaged in a PC card format; cable modems, infrared keyboards, remote controls, computers equipped with cable modems; Pre-paid phone cards; Internet starter kits, diskettes, manuals and instructions for access to the Internet and on-line services; stickers, mouse pads and promotional items; Digital cable television terminals, namely digital set-top boxes for digital cable television service | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Provision of an Internet and on-line service to businesses via cable network; transmission of data services; provision of access to the Internet and on-line services, installation services in respect of the provision of access to the Internet and on-line services, provision of user support packages and programs for use in connection with access to the Internet and on-line services, all offered to businesses by means of terrestrial, satellite, wireless or other means of communication; video-on-demand services and on-line interactive computer and cable television services, namely "web tv"; high speed Internet connectivity between businesses; residential access to businesses via the Internet; Provision of local high-speed data transmission, private line voice, image, broadcast video and audio telecommunications; Volunteer community children's safety program conducted on Halloween; Provision of an Internet web site; Production and exhibition of artistic works electronically, namely via the Internet and by means of software; cable television production and programming; Provision of an Internet service to consumers and educational institutions via cable network; transmission of data services, provision of access to the Internet and on-line services, installation services in respect of the provision of access to the Internet and on-line services, provision of user support packages and programs for use in connection with access to the Internet and on-line services, all offered to consumers and educational institutions by means of terrestrial, satellite, wireless or other means of communication | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |