Drawing for KTRAVEL

USPTO serial 76026215

KTRAVEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KTRAVEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Glenn M. Seager

GLENN M SEAGER CROMPTON SEAGER & TUFTE LLC331 SECOND AVE S STE 895MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401-2246UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for planning and booking travel arrangementsACTIVE—
039travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportationACTIVE—
042travel agency services, namely, making reservations and booking for temporary lodgingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 22, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 24, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 17, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 16, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance