USPTO serial 76026328
ICE INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER ENGINEERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ICE INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER ENGINEERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman
JONATHAN D REICHMAN KENYON & KENYON1500 K ST N W STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1257UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, COMPUTER SITE DESIGN, COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS, INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, DATABASE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF DATABASES, PROVIDING ACCESS TO A CROSSING NETWORK FOR THE TRADING OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, AND INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS | ACTIVE | May 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |