USPTO serial 76026522
STITCH & BITCH CAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2596818Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 23, 2002
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STITCH & BITCH CAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Georges Nahitchevansky
Jason M. Vogel Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP1114 Avenue of the AmericasNEW YORK, NY 10036-7703UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sew Fast/Sew Easy, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sew Fast/Sew Easy, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sew Fast/Sew Easy, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named STITCH & BITCH CAFE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2008 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |