USPTO serial 76026559
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph R. Dreitler
JOSEPH R DREITLER VORYS SATER SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP52 E GAY STCOLUMBUS, OH 43216-1008UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | on-line financial and accounting transaction services, namely, forecasting asset management, financial planning, financial management, financial reporting by means of a global communications network | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
| 038 | customized communication services between buyers and sellers of goods and services over a global computer communications network | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
| 042 | providing information to buyers for ordering goods and services in a wide variety of fields by means of a global computer information network, and ordering services to buyers and sellers for ordering goods and services in a wide variety of fields by means of a global computer information network including ordering order transaction routing, multiple protocol support for exchanging content and transaction information, and converting an order into the supplier's preferred transaction protocol-and catalog development and maintenance services; providing service of automated work-flow for aging goods and services to sellers by means of a global computer information network | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |