USPTO serial 76026868
CLAUDEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLAUDEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charlesbourg, CA
Charlesbourg, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Tape measure with markings at 12, 16, and 24 inches to facilitate the measurement of wood pieces during construction; adhesive tape measure in a casing with markings at 12, 16, and 24 inches to facilitate the measurement of wood pieces during construction; measuring tools in the nature of a yardstick, namely, pieces of wood specially marked, printed, and engraved at each 12, 16, and 24 inches to facilitate the measurement of wood pieces during construction | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 2002 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| May 6, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |