Drawing for ANZ EGATE

USPTO serial 76027154

ANZ EGATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATEJA, JOANNA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANZ EGATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Oliff

JAMES A OLIFFP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data processing equipment, namely computers, credit card verification machines and electronic funds transfer point of sale machines; pre-recorded disks, magnetic carriers and optical carriers featuring encryption software for use in information security; software for the management of financial transactions, electronic banking, messaging management, transaction management, payment management and information on electronic banking and reporting and analysis, namely computer communication software to allow customers to access bank account information and transact bank business; computer software for facilitating electronic payments, namely, computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer networkACTIVE—
035Business services, namely, auditing, bill posting, book-keeping, providing business information via website provided on global computer networks, conducting statistical analysis, conducting business appraisals; compilation of statistics; drawing up pay list; preparing wage packets, preparing profit surveysACTIVE—
036Banking; electronic and Internet banking services; financing and facilitating financial transactions, namely, credit and debit card services, credit card and debit card verification and transaction processing services; electronic payment services, namely electronic processing of electronic checks and smart card transactions; providing credit, namely, issuing credit cards and loan financing; providing online banking services; providing financial guarantees, monetary exchange transactions; financial nominee services, namely, holding of securities as a nominee, safe deposit box services; merchant banking servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 6, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 21, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance