USPTO serial 76027164
THE ART LAW LIBRARY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ART LAW LIBRARY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES LORIN SILVERBERG
JAMES LORIN SILVERBERG GOLDFARB & SILVERBERG1501 M ST NW STE 1150WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PAPER GOODS AND PRINTED AND PUBLISHED MATTER AND MATERIALS, NAMELY, BOOKS AND PUBLICATIONS IN THE FORM OF LEGAL FORMS, ARTICLES AND NEWSLETTERS FEATURING INFORMATION ABOUT ART AND ENTERTAINMENT LAW | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1984 |
| 041 | PUBLICATION OF BOOKS, MAGAZINES, ARTICLES, AND LEGAL FORMS FEATURING LEGAL INFORMATION; LIBRARY SERVICES FEATURING ART AND ENTERTAINMENT LAW RELATED INFORMATION | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1984 |
| 042 | LEGAL SERVICES; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, EXPERT WITNESS SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FORENSIC APPRAISAL AND VALUATION OF INTANGIBLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND TANGIBLE ART AND ENTERTAINMENT GOODS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE LEGAL FORMS, ARTICLES AND NEWSLETTERS IN THE FIELD OF ART AND ENTERTAINMENT LAW; AND PROVIDING AN ON-LINE DATABASE OF RESOURCES IN THE FIELD OF LAW, PARTICULARLY, IN THE FIELDS OF ART, ENTERTAINMENT, MEDIA, INTERNET AND PUBLISHING LAW | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |