USPTO serial 76027234
AP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan Kent Auberry
EVAN KENT AUBERRY SMITH HELMS MULLISS & MOORE, LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 21927GREENSBORO, NC 27420UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for agricultural, horticultural and forestry use, namely, adjuvants for use with pesticides, agents for use in the separation of solids from aqueous systems, namely, flocculation, sedimentation, dehydration and retention agents, and absorbent, superabsorbent and soluble polymers designed to improve the capability of soils to hold water and nutrients; photographic chemicals; reagents for scientific use; unprocessed artificial resins, unprocessed plastics, and absorbent, superabsorbent and soluble polymers for use in the production of hygiene and sanitary products, for use in the manufacture of packaging, and for use in the manufacture of power and communication cables; absorbent, superabsorbent and soluble polymers for industrial waste treatment; absorbent, supberabsorbent and soluble polymers for use in the manufacture of pest control preparations; fertilizers for agricultural and domestic use; fire proofing and fire extinguishing preparations; chemical substances for use in preserving food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |