USPTO serial 76027335
COOKIE JAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COOKIE JAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Devon A. Rolf
DEVON A ROLF SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLPONE KANSAS CITY PL1200 MAIN STKANSAS CITY, MO 64105-2118Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | THE PROVISION OF INTERNET-BASED NETWORKS THAT SUPPORT TRADE, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS, COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION EXCHANGES, INCLUDING THE COLLECTION, STORAGE, TRANSFER, PROTECTION, AND DISSEMINATION OF DATA; THE HOSTING AND PROVISION AND SUPPORT OF WEBSITES, INTERNET, INTRANET, EXTRANET AND OTHER ELECTRONIC DATA AND COMMUNICATION FACILITIES; THE PROVISION OF DATA COLLECTION, MAINTENANCE AND EXCHANGE SERVICES; THE AUTHENTICATION AND VERIFICATION OF PARTICIPANTS, DATA AND TRANSACTIONS; THE PROVISION OF ACCESS TO, AND SUPPORT OF TRANSACTION IN, ELECTRONIC TRADING NETWORKS; THE AGGREGATION OF PURCHASING, FINANCIAL ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND OTHER PRODUCTS AND SERVICES; THE FACILITATION OF THE TRADING OF GOODS AND SERVICES; THE ADMINISTRATION OF PURCHASING AND TRADING POLICIES AND AUTHORITIES; THE SUPPORT AND PROVISION OF ACCOUNTING AND ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SERVICES AND SOFTWARE AND APPLICATIONS AND SOLUTIONS; THE SUPPORT AND ADMINISTRATION OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNITIES OF INTEREST AND RELATED CONTENT; THE TRANSMISSION AND PROCESSING OF ORDER AND TRANSACTIONAL INFORMATION; THE PROVISION OF ELECTRONIC AND OTHER ACCOUNTING AND PAYMENT SYSTEM SERVICES; THE CATAGORIZATION AND PROVISION OF INFORMATION REGARDING GOODS, SERVICES AND FINANCIAL AND OTHER MATTERS; AND THE PROVISION OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE SUPPORT SERVICES; REGISTRATION SERVICES FOR ACCESS TO A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; CONTROL AND DISTRIBUTION OF TARGETED MATERIALS TO END USERS VIA A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; DATA COLLECTION AND MINING SERVICES PERTAINING TO ACTIVITIES OF USERS OF A GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |