USPTO serial 76027398
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sherman Oaks, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
CORNERSTONE INTERNATIONAL GROUP LIMITED
HONG KONG, HK
Other trademarks owned by CORNERSTONE INTERNATIONAL GROUP LIMITED
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walter G. Maxwell
CORNERSTONE INTERNATIONAL GROUP LIMITEDFLAT 13 B, CLARKE MANSION, 9 KINGSTON STHONG KONG,HONG KONG| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FOR BUSINESS AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS AND A CONSORTIUM OF MANAGEMENT CONSULTING ORGANIZATIONS OFFERING THE SERVICES OF PERSONNEL REPLACEMENT AND RECRUITMENT OF EXECUTIVE AND PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL OFFERED ON A RETAINED BASIS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 12, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |